Every year as baseball spring
training comes around, the public, fans, and baseball writers hear of an
abundance of injuries occurring to players. In Bob Nightengale’s, Injury
bug reaks havoc at spring training camps, he expresses how spring
training is the time that you see most of the injuries happening in baseball
players. Chicago White Sox coordinator Dale Torborg states in this article,
“This is the time of year you see all of the injuries” (Injury
bug reaks havoc at spring training camps. Nightengale reports some of
the players that have injured themselves in spring training, one being the
Oakland Athletics third baseman, Scott Sixemore who had knee surgery, another
being the Cleveland Indians center fielder Grady Sizemore, who had back
surgery, and the latter, the new Cincinnati Reds closer Ryan Madson, who has a
sore arm now (Injury
bug reaks havoc at spring training camps).
Obviously, all of these injuries
occuring is a concern to the players themselves, and the public but what seems
to be an underlying concern is how detailed the reports of players injuries are
and how much the players seem to have to tell the public about their injuries. What
happened to people being able to have some privacy in their life when it
pertains to personal matters? In Al Filreis’ paper, The baseball fan, he expresses the view of Fred Stein who believes,
“Baseball essentially is about the player” (Al Filreis). He is implying here
that baseball has nothing to do with the fans, but if baseball has nothing to
do with the spectatorship, and all to do with the players, then why do fans
insist on knowing everything about a player’s life, especially, something as
personal as injuries? It seems apparent to me that since a player is a person as well, fans should realize that they should be able to keep some parts of their lives to themselves. However, fans seem to believe that players on their team “owe” it to
them to give details on their personal life, specifically injuries. When are
fans crossing the line?
In The baseball fan, Al Filreis also touches on the love that Philip
Roth feels in his novel, The Great American Novel, “Philip Roth similarly loved
baseball as a young man not just “for the fun of playing it” but for its
“mythic and aesthetic dimension”
(Filreis, 135). Yes, many fans and players fall in love with the game of
baseball, but is this love too obsessive? We all have a right to privacy in
this world, especially on personal matters, the question I propose is, are fans
crossing the line of a person’s right to privacy when they insist on knowing
the details of the injuries of certain players?
Baseball fans (and sports fans in general) have always been somewhat obsessive over injury news, but I feel like the rise of fantasy baseball has really exacerbated the situation. Ask anyone who's played fantasy baseball and they know that a trip to Dr. James Andrews spells the end of your player's season. The instant nature of news nowadays doesn't help either. Is it over the line to know so much about a player? Perhaps. But the career of a baseball player is largely played out on television for all to see, so there is a different sense of privacy compared to the average citizen.
ReplyDelete